![]() |
It's really been a struggle for NVIDIA ever since ATI dropped a bomb on them with the RV770. It completely caught them off guard and which is also the primary reason for the existence of the 9800GTX+.
We've already reviewed one 9800GTX+ from Zotac which incidentally is clocked at the same frequency as the XFX one, so it should be interesting to see jut how much two cards, based on the same core and same panel, but from different manufacturers actually differ in performance.
Let's take a quick look at the specifications of the card and the different models available.
Specifications


Like I said, the specs are virtually identical to the Zoatc card except for maybe the memory, which is around 50Hz more for the Zotac. The rest is the same including the reference cooler from NVIDIA.
You would think that since they are clocked at the same speeds the performance would also be similar, well that's not always the case and you'd be surprised at how much performance can differ between two identical cards from different manufacturers.
There are four different variations for the 9800GTX+, the one we have is the overclocked version without the Assassins Creed game. There is no indication on the box, so you have to go by the product id.
The GPU-Z screenshot still recognizes the fabrication process as 65nm but all 9800GTX+ are indeed 55nm.
Next up is the bundle and accessories.
![]() |

Report abuse