• Samsung Producing 80nm DDR2

    Samsung Producing 80nm DDR2

    Techtree News Staff, Mar 13, 2006 1720 hrs IST

    Samsung Electronics has announced that it is the first manufacturer to begin mass production of 80nm DDR2 DRAM 512Mb.

    mail share

In an announcement Samsung Electronics proclaimed itself the industry's first manufacturer, to begin mass production of DDR2 DRAM - 512 Megabit (Mb) - on an 80 nanometer (nm) scale.

Samsung said that the switch from 90 nm to 80 nm process technology would enable the company to increase its production efficiency by almost 50 percent, making it capable of meeting the increased demand for DDR2.

Samsung's transition from 90 nm to 80 nm was greatly facilitated by the fact that 80 nm process technology utilizes several basic features of 90 nm geometries, and thus its fabrication required minimal upgrades.

The use of a recess channel array transistor (RCAT) allowed for speedy shift to 80 nm circuitry. The RCAT has a three-dimensional transistor layout, which considerably enhances the refresh rate - a key factor in data storage. Samsung's RCAT also reduces cell area coverage, making for increased process scaling by freeing-up space for chip-per-wafer growth.

Tom Trill, director - DRAM marketing, Samsung Semiconductors, said, "With demand for DDR2 at its highest level, since it made its market debut in 2004, our 80 nm technology provides us with the ability to more efficiently support the sustained demand growth that is expected in the DDR2 marketplace this year."

Gartner Dataquest - a semiconductor industry research organization, predicts that DDR2 memory will make up more than half of the entire DRAM market in 2006.

Follow Techtree on Twitter



Discussion Board
(13) Comments
sujoy
,Kolkata, on Jun 15, 2008 08:14 AM
Does anybody know where to purchase Samsung DDR2 SDRAM in India?
Aryan K
,Mysore, on Mar 13, 2006 05:24 PM
Wht is 80nm mean??.....
meterman
,meterville, on Mar 13, 2006 06:01 PM
80nm = new monkies 1 new monkey = 1 nano meter 1 nano meter= 1E-9 meters =.000000009 meters
Venkatnarayan H
,Thane (W), on Mar 13, 2006 10:03 PM
80nm refers to the processing technology (for making these chips). Loosely speaking, it is saying that the smallest feature size that they can fabricate is 80nm. More accurately, the DRAM half-metal pitch (distance bween 2 interconnect lines inside the DRAM chip) is 80nm.
prakram
,Bangalore, on Mar 21, 2006 10:38 AM
People - Kindly refrain from humiliating others as you know what they dont. Remember that you too werent born blessed with this knowledge. <BR/> Adding, Aryan - would be appreciated if you can try out your question on google/yahoo first, and if you still dont get to the answer, post it on the forum.
Dalibor
,tivat, on Mar 13, 2006 07:43 PM
I have many Samsung things (tv,ac,monitor...) and i can say that it has the best quality on the market.I think that this new technology advance will open door to more speed,less size and better performance.Soon i hope hard drives-bottleneck of system will be replaced with this kind of fast accesible memory lined up in pc. If anyone deserve to be on the top its SAMSUNG
David
,Seattle, on Mar 13, 2006 09:17 PM
umm...this kind of memory can't replace a hard-drive. You're confusing with eeprom (flash) memory. See Sandisk, Lexar, Kingston etc... not Samsung
hot_shot
,Kolkata, on Mar 15, 2006 12:27 AM
Samsung typically generates a flawed product in every 1000 products it markets. I've had a horrible experience with a Samsung mobile phone. Their customer support stinks!! The only products Samsung is good at churning out are displays.
makavelio
,mumbai, on Mar 13, 2006 06:07 PM
80nm benefits the customer how....except meeting the demand an all... lowered latencies on the ram/cheaper modules ? wat ?
matt
,denver, on Mar 14, 2006 12:56 AM
they can cram more stuff on the same size chip
lidia
,san diego, on Mar 13, 2006 10:54 PM
why is more technology better?
Genius
,Lexington, Ky., on Mar 14, 2006 12:52 AM
Because crapping outside, dying of cholera and freezing to death suck. Duh.
Harshul
,mumbai, on Mar 13, 2006 05:22 PM
more info

Opinion Poll