Taking the Net in Your Own Hands

Taking the Net in Your Own Hands

Varun Singh, May 21, 2005 1010 hrs IST

Personalise the world wide web

Ever since Firefox came out, I've been waiting to see where the "community" will take it, and where Firefox itself will take the internet. In fact, I was so enthused, that after a long time, I took to writing regular articles again, and wrote a "Guide to Firefox" with the first level of evolutions for the popular open source browser. I detailed how you could personalize the browser to behave the way you'd like, to look the way you'd like, and to work at speeds you'd like. People loved it!

But there, you're customizing only a small part of the whole web experience; you can only customize the "window" through which you see the world, not the world itself. We humans like to personalize the world we live in; at office, we put tiny things in our cubicle that would make it look more personal; at a restaurant, we personalize our favorite preparation with a certain flavoring, or add a dash of lime to it to give it that extra zing. Personalizing the world makes it that much more livable, enjoyable. Imagine the frustration of people when they can't do the same to the Internet. I'm sure each of you have a certain favorite website, where you'd like to see a certain feature added (or removed), and the site's administrators just don't have the resources, or the will to make that change for you.

We can see examples of this right here on Techtree; quite a few forums and Ask Techtree users have been asking to make web links active so that users can click on them at once, rather than having to copy-paste them (we've chosen to avoid that as of now because of many attempted phishing scams on various other forums), or users asking for something as simple as a look-n-feel change to the way Ask Techtree's reply box appears.

How about taking things in your own hands?

Take a look at these tools; Greasemonkey, and Platypus. Both are Mozilla / Firefox plugins that let you browse the web "actively". Here's what the Platypus website says about active browsing: "...In active browsing, the client browser actively modifies content before display. Instead of accepting web pages "as is", active browsers transparently modify, delete and edit web pages according to specific user needs."

These two plugins let you take a website's functionality in your own hands. With Platypus, you can remove parts of the page you don't wish to see, or move them elsewhere on the page; change the style and format of the page, modify links and button behavior, or just add new stuff by inserting your own HTML or Javascript code. The possibilities are endless; you could make a "fixed resolution" website expand to fill your own resolution. You could add a new "delete" button to GMail, which shortcuts the entire procedure of sending a message / thread to the trash, and then emptying it from there. You could remove elements from a site's homepage which you're not interested in (e.g., the box that shows my editorial on the techtree homepage), or keep only those you're interested in (e.g. Tech Trivia). You could even make all text with "http://", or "www." in them appear as properly formatted links. Basically, you could do anything that the site's administrators could do, and all from your own side, without having to ask them for permission. Then you could just go to Greasemonkey's site, and share your custom script with other users.

And these plugins aren't even in "stable release" yet; I can see their usage getting a lot more pervasive when they reach a stable version, and are maybe embedded into Firefox's core itself, to allow for faster, easier, more efficient customization of webpages, and simple "right-click" searching for customization possibilities of a certain website you're visiting.

Website makers; watch out, the users are taking over this joint (or maybe it's good for the both of us, we'll see).



Discussion Board
Ravish
,Delhi, on Apr 17, 2007 12:41 PM
What about the memory leak problem in Firefox! Its sets your RAM usage on fire!
techie
,techno city, on Jun 29, 2005 03:00 AM
Opera is the best.
a2zsam
,Chennai, on May 25, 2005 07:52 PM
all the websites open without a problem,there is nothing wrong with firefox,so far experience has been very good.Lot of options,good download speed.You name the features,everything is fine with firefox.Just a matter of time before everyone gets accustomed to this fine web browser
Pradip Shah
,Mumbai, on May 28, 2005 08:39 PM
I beg to differ. Try ICICI bank or Asian Age newspaper.
a2zsam
,chennai, on Jun 07, 2005 05:09 PM
icici bank website opens...i have checked..about asianage it doesnt..but that doesnt mean firefox is bad..IE is used worldwide opens almost all websites..but that doesnt mean it is best ..firefox doesnt open very few websites that doesnt mean it is bad..overall..firefox is better than most of the web browsers around...browsing speed, features,download speed, options available,plugins...all make this firefox better than other browsers..dont make conclusions by one or two websites..there are security holes in IE ..i hope you know it..firefox is much secure also..well please use firefox..and i am sure u will have a good experience over all. ..
antonio
,rome, on May 30, 2005 02:01 AM
opera s*cks man.... try using firefox for a ouple of days before you boast of opera...!
a2zsam
,chennai, on Jun 07, 2005 05:02 PM
Yes you r right...firefox is lot better and there is no problem at all..someone has pointed out that icici doesnt open...but it does without any problem..firefox has problems too but its merits overshadows everything...it is fast, has features,opens 99% of websites without problem..download speed is good ..what else u want ?has good plugins..and has good features....i am sure everybody will agree once u start using it
eyelusion
,Dubai, on May 30, 2005 12:06 PM
NEEEEEEEXT!! Somebody wake up these guys! Don't you see nobody is responding.
NALIN BHATARA
,NEW DELHI, on May 30, 2005 01:16 AM
Hi Varun, What’s The Latest Development About Ur Home Project (Referring 2 Ur Article Home to a Techie). Do Keep Us Posted About That 2. Congrats & Very Best Of Luck For The Same. :-)
desmasic
,Delhi, on May 24, 2005 10:55 PM
I find it funny how people ignore world class OPERA in their articles everywhere, raving only about Firefox and some other unknown browsers. Jeez, OPERA 'is' what firefox tries to copy in every release, and what it's 100 of plugins try to do. All the features you mentioned in your article are clean flat copies of OPERA, which is way older and doesn't require any 'plugins' (which can be security risk at some time if someone exploits a bug) to give you kickass features all other browsers have mostly through so called 'plugins'. Lame ppl, totally lame. Explore the already established browsers, not the 'non-existent' and 'never before heard' one's.
Aayush Iyer
,Mumbai, on May 25, 2005 12:17 PM
Plugins are not made by Mozilla, it's made by the community. Opera and Firefox are miles apart. Opera is trying to find a middle ground between features and size whilst Firefox focuses solely on a tiny footprint and scalability. These "plugins" which you say are copied make Firefox the fastest growing browser. Finally, if you've never heard of Firefox, I must ask which rock is it you have been sleeping under. Opera's user scripts are a beta feature to date, and I think that can explain who is leading this race of web customization
desmasic
,Delhi, on May 28, 2005 01:28 AM
Umm.. careful, don't assume you know more than me. I am not assuming myself the same, but btw, 'plugins by community' proves my point that Firefox is useless when you compare direct in built features with OPERA. So I really don't see what 'point' you made in your posts except for sounding pissed, and yeah, it's pretty lame.
Pradip Shah
,Mumbai, on May 28, 2005 08:16 PM
I have tried Opera on n number of occassions but have always had problems. Mozilla has been the only browser which has been troublefree for me so far & this is more than 8 years. Yes there are some exceptions to the rule where some of the webdesigners have wedded their sites to Internet Explorer, such as for some banks, but pretty soon they too will have to fall in line since java can do whole lot more than microsft's asp.
eyelusion
,Dubai, on May 23, 2005 03:40 PM
One more Adtricle... hey you TT guys who do you delete posts ... once again my post has been deleted. Stop this feature if you want to read only what you like...
Deitrix
,Mumbai, on May 22, 2005 12:29 PM
Been using these plugins since they got posted on slashdot...love them both. Phenomenal control over webpages. Also checkout user submitted scripts at greasemonkey's site
Kapil
,delhi, on May 21, 2005 07:37 PM
the Avg user WANTS to c the site in a particular way, he sure shouldn b bothered abt MAKING it look d way he wants!! Cmon, y r u guys getting paid for then?!
Mohammed
,Navi Mumbai, on May 21, 2005 07:15 PM
"We can see examples of this right here on Techtree; quite a few forums and Ask Techtree users have been asking to make web links active so that users can click on them at once, rather than having to copy-paste them (we've chosen to avoid that as of now because of many attempted phishing scams on various other forums)" Now atleast i can say TT employees and editors do know wats going on in the forum. So when is TT making the transition to php ???? Bcos it would make the forum and ask TT more better

Opinion Poll