![]() |
Rumors of an iPhone Mini and iPhone Nano have been doing their rounds for a very long time now. We think that it is something that people desire and we had even written about it a while back. However, so far no such devices have seen the light of day, which seems to suggest that Apple is sticking to its "best or nothing" theory for its product line. As consolation, Apple keeps manufacturing the earlier generation model -- currently it is the 3GS, along with their most recent flagship (the iPhone 4). But the iPhone 3GS isn't substantially cheaper, especially in a country like ours where the official pricing (Rs. 35,500) is downright horrible.
Apple seems to have finally turned its attention to the matter, as more and more news of a smaller iPhone keep cropping up these days. So far, we know that it could roughly be either half or two-thirds the size of the original, will be sold without a contract for anything between USD 200 to 300 (Rs. 9,115 to Rs. 13,675), will have some form of voice-based input and an edge-to-edge screen. So, what are the pros and cons if the company actually goes ahead with this?
I, Rohan Naravane, believe that an iPhone Mini is the need of the hour, while my colleague Prasad Naik has a different perspective, which suggests that an iPhone Mini doesn't fit in Apple's product portfolio.
Why Apple Should Make an iPhone Mini
First and foremost because the iPhone's contract free price is out of reach for many among us. This is where Google's Android based phones are using this opportunity to capitalize by giving a similar functionality at a cost that's at least 50 percent lower. For example, hardware-to-hardware, the LG Optimus One P500 isn't any different from the iPhone 3GS, yet sells for almost one third of the latter's official India price. On the software front, Android's UI is fairly intuitive, the support for apps is second to none. I cannot think of a task that can be done on the iPhone but that cannot be done on the Android phone.
India and China are two countires that have witnessed fast growth in cellphone usage. Although the iPhone was well received in China, the Indian response was ironically lukewarm and we wonder why. Before all the inexpensive Androids eat up this market, Apple should have at least one weapon to fight back.
Back in 2007 when the iPhone just came out, there was NOTHING like it and Apple absolutely deserved to charge their customers a premium for it. But today? If you look around, all the other manufacturers and mobile OS makers have devices that are equally cool and equally functional, if not better. Is iPhone 4 a great smartphone? Of course yes, but it does not have the privilege of standing alone at the top like it did four years ago. And with every new iPhone-killer launch, Apple loses more and more potential iPhone consumers.
Is it possible to make an iPhone Mini without a big compromise? Of course. The rumors suggest a phone that's smaller, yet have an edge-to-edge display. After using phones with 3.2 inch displays like the HTC Wildfire, we feel that screen size is quite fair. Despite being 0.3 inches smaller than the iPhone's 3.5-inch display, HTC could accommodate a big enough portrait mode on-screen QWERTY, which did not feel cramped at all. But if it is any smaller, typing could be an issue. But hey, before the iPad launch, people had hoped for Apple to come up with some innovative way to type, but all it did was put a big-ass version of the same iOS keyboard there, and people got used to it.
Having consistency with display resolutions is Apple's forte, as it keeps developers happy by not having to redesign their apps differently. The iPhone 4's quadrupled resolution (960 x 640 pixels) over previous iPhones is still the best display in terms of pixels per inch (PPI) one can buy today. So, that can be passed over to the iPhone 5, while the iPhone 3GS's 480 x 320 pixels can be put into the smaller non-IPS display of the iPhone Mini -- which would at least look crisper than how it looks on a bigger 3.5-inch display.
There's talk of leftover internal components of the iPhone 4 being used in this smaller iteration. Hell yeah, while the iPhone 5 gets a dual-core processor treatment, the current fastest Apple A4 architecture should make the iPhone Mini fly (and very unlike how laggy the iPhone 3G has become post the iOS 4 update). Journalists across the world have lauded the 5 megapixel back-illuminated sensor on the iPhone 4, so possibly that could even be carried onto the iPhone 5.
In that case, the iPhone Mini could have the 3.2 megapixel sensor of the iPhone 3GS, with 720p HD video recording capability like the newest generation iPod Touch. Hey, I would have liked that 5 megapixel camera, but feasibility would trump desire if they actually sell it for USD 200. Rest of the things like 3G, Wi-fi, GPS chips and the accelerometer/gyro will obviously stay.
Lastly, in my opinion an iPhone Mini will do nothing to hurt Apple. Just like how an iPod Touch somewhat acts like a gateway to a person actually considering an iPhone to be his next cellphone, the iPhone Mini too could coax people to upgrade to its big brother in the future. If there isn't an iPhone Mini ever, people obviously look at Android for the answer. And what happens when they want to swap their entry-level Android phone with something better? How many will want to crossover to the iOS side, as opposed to purchasing a Google Phone?
I end by saying that even if it's a little late, the iPhone Mini still has a great potential, especially in a country like India.
![]() |




Report abuse