• Facebook Banned in Bangladesh

    Facebook Banned in Bangladesh

    Techtree News Staff, May 31, 2010 1318 hrs IST

    Lands in trouble again

    mail share

Looks like Facebook is never far from controversies. After getting banned in Pakistan over a contest about Prophet Muhammad's Caricatures, it's Bangladesh who has now banned the site over a similar matter. The country's telecommunications regulator, the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC), has banned the site temporarily after a Bangladeshi national was arrested  for uploading satirical images of Prophet Mohammed along with the country's leaders.

The citizen, Mahbub Alam Rodin, was arrested from Bangladesh capital Dhaka and was charged with posting satirical images on Facebook. Rodin was taken in to custody by the Bangladeshi elite Rapid Action Battalion (RAB). Apparently, the RAB was tracking Rodin's online activity since the past year and has termed the person's online conduct to be 'offensive'. Rodin allegedly had seven Facebook accounts he created with fake e-mail IDs. All seven ID's are being checked now for libelous content. Bangladeshi authorities have said that access to the site will be restored after the pages with the objectionable content are removed.

Rodin is an unemployed Bangladeshi national who used several online aliases like 'Brigadier Mahadi', 'Sepahi Mahadi', 'Imam Hossain', 'Rodin Al', 'Mohammad Al Mahadi' and 'Junaida Khandaker Zihan', according to Commander Mohammad Sohail, director of RAB's legal and media wing, as quoted saying by the Daily Star.

The blockage of Facebook was followed by protests by the student community in Bangladesh who were seen on the streets. Experts have also criticised the government for blocking the entire website - instead of the individual profiles that contained the objectionable content. Islamic political parties in the country have however welcomed the ban.

While the recent Facebook controversy was more Pakistan centric, let us also remind you that Bangladesh too has had a history of blocking websites over various issues. In March 2009, popular video sharing website YouTube was blocked for political reasons rather than religious.

While we file this story, a Pakistan Court has called for unblocking Facebook in the country.

Follow Techtree on Twitter



Discussion Board
(14) Comments
Monir
,Dhaka, on Jun 04, 2010 12:42 AM
This is what the media has done always and continues to do! For whoever-wrote-this-article's information, BD has only ONCE blocked a website and 'does not have a history of blocking websites over various issues'! besides. Every person belonging to the recent generation including me, oppose this fact of banning a website but the media has been reporting negatively on our country! Please go learn something before you brainwash people!
Frosted Flake
,Bandon Oregon USA, on May 31, 2010 07:05 PM
The point to take home is that the net is not above censorship. It seems that ANY fourth rate government can just flip a switch and make any or all of it vanish. Presumably, one need not be a government to reach the switch. And presumably, a 3rd, 2nd or 1st rate government would be more subtle about it. The question is, is this a good thing? If freedom of speech and the press are rights, is it a permissible thing. And if it is not, is the proper approach to address it Political or Technological ? I am visualizing a net without wires. This would be a more robust system in that government would not be able to block it. Not without blocking everything else, including police and military communications.
Saad
,Dhaka, on Jun 01, 2010 02:20 PM
We know..u have told the right thing..u don't cut ur head just becoz u have a headache.There r many ways to block offensive links.This is an example of the government's lack of efficiency.
roony
,txt, on Jun 01, 2010 12:10 PM
Internet is full of good and bad things.its up to an individual to decide whether to see good or bad.nobody is forcing anyone to see a particular Prophet Muhammad's Caricatures,just like porn this should be left for individual to decide.there are many websites showing how to make bomb,and kill their own innocent people.have these countries banned those websites?no.then why make foolish attempts.how many websites they gonna ban?what if we see caricatures on millions of porn sites?
sadia
,dhaka, on Jun 01, 2010 02:12 PM
i completely agree with what u said....its really not the solution to banned a site like this to ur countrymen...
Alex Khan
,Jamaica, on May 31, 2010 03:46 PM
When u attack Black people, they call it RACISM. When u attack Jewish people, they call it ANTI-SEMETISM. When u attack women, they call it SEXISM. When u attack homosexuality,they call it INTOLERANCE. When u attack a Country, they call it TREASON. When u attack a religious sect, they call it HATE. But when they attack the Prophet Mohamed (PBUH), they call it FREEDOM OF SPEECH!! In the name of freedom of press west has indeed declare war against Islam. West considers them most civilized but unfortunately they are very in tolerant about Islam and always out to demean world’s most modern and scientific religion where there is no doubt or confusion. I think we should follow peaceful means to protest such malicious propaganda against Islam and our dearest Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon Him) at the same time refrain ourselves from any violent activity which is against the teaching of Islam and our holy Quran.
fuckallahforeve
,Colombo, on May 31, 2010 07:03 PM
no one said racists, anti-semitics, sexists, traitors, and discriminators shouldn't have freedom of speech.. actually in civilized countries they have freedom of speech too, along with freedom to insult prophet Muhammad.. but in countries like Bangladesh, insulting women, gays, Jews are allowed, except insulting this hell of a prophet..
Gali Khan
,Dhaka, on Jun 01, 2010 06:25 AM
Pornographic images on the Web of the nations' 2 favourite grannies is truely disgusting. The idiot who posted it may not be 'well in the head' and there are millions of pornographic images on the Web! Who cares? There's no real reason to stop millions of people in Bangladesh accessing their favourite social network: except lack of thought.. Techtree, there is no BTRA, it's BTRC- Bangladesh Telecom Regulatory Commission, do your homework next time.
Rajib
,Bangladesh, on May 31, 2010 08:51 PM
Colombo, u are sick! Go get some help dude. U are missing da whole point here buddy. U better be locked in prison n u should also remember what happened ur country before u claim urself a civilised person
Alex
,Jamaica, on May 31, 2010 07:27 PM
To the guy from 3rd world country -Colombo and with a very offensive name ( ID ) We know about the Sri Lankan people who live there life under a 1 dollar also know so many Monkey looking Sri Lankan people what type odd job they do in the USA
Mushik
,Dhaka, Bangladesh, on May 31, 2010 04:32 PM
I must say of all the articles I have read about the facebook ban in Bangladesh, this one is the most authentic also statistically sound. Most of the people like Alex Khan from Jamaica(from my previous comment) thinks that facebook is temporarily banned from Bangladesh due to prophet incident but its not the entire reason. The ban was imposed mainly because of the unsolicited disturbing pictures uploaded by the rummy lad. Frankly from my point of view the entire idea is ridiculous.
Brian
,Guatemala, on May 31, 2010 02:57 PM
er what happened to freespeech? Obviously the issue here is that users are unable to choose which facebooks pages to look at, or which videos to watch.... they are forced to view these offensive images by the companies involved ...so of course the government must get involved - otherwise the freedom of choice would also become a factor. Ya know there is a magic solution - its called don't visit the sites! I have never seen depictions of any other gods in a satirical manner - The Life of Brian was purely a comedy.....but wait maybe i am wrong and we should ban Japan from making televisions.
shammi huda
,dhaka, on May 31, 2010 01:44 PM
the ban is actually cos someone put up satirical pictures of the pm, sheikh hasina, and the official reason referencing caricatures of the prophet is merely eyewash...
Shreyas
,Bangalore, on May 31, 2010 01:34 PM
All this copy & paste & "woosh" to the publish button, ain't it?

Opinion Poll