![]() |
Windows XP can be nicknamed as Microsoft's ageing workhorse. People were reluctant to shift to Windows Vista since it was a system resource hog that would crawl on slower machines. Last year when netbooks had picked up steam, manufacturers bundled Windows XP Home instead of their newer OS, because they knew Vista would be too much for these paltry-powered machines to handle.
In October 2009, Microsoft tried to set things right by launching Windows 7 - a revamped, near-perfect Operating system. Tech experts roared that it was what Windows Vista should have originally been. Microsoft had earlier released with "Starter" editions of XP and Vista. These versions were stripped of many features available in higher "Home Premium" or "Ultimate" versions. They even had a ridiculous limitation that did not let users open more than three applications at a time. Probably this is the reason why they did not do so well.
In order to show how optimized Windows 7 was for low-power devices, Microsoft's Steven Sinofsky showed the first working version of the OS running on a netbook. With just 1GB of RAM and ultra low-voltage Atom processors, it was a relief to see Windows 7 smoothly working on these devices. They also committed to replace XP Home edition with Windows 7 Starter edition on netbooks after its launch. Finally, the most ridiculous facet (the 3 application limit) has been removed in Windows 7 starter.
Netbooks coming to the market from now on will come either with Windows 7 Starter or XP Home pre-installed. Let's face it, XP's interface was becoming ancient and a fresh change is always welcome. So how advantageous is this upgrade to the end user? This is a first look at Windows 7 Starter; we look at what's good and bad about this version of the OS.
![]() |




Report abuse