"Nokia is doomed" - screamed the banner of a Nokia N97 review at Gizmodo,
one of the more popular tech blogs these days. While the editors at
Gizmodo might have gone a tad overboard with their crystal ball gazing,
the N97 in general seems to have uncharacteristically split the
consumer tech world -- or at least the consumer tech gurus commanding
popular opinion, right down the middle. I say uncharacteristically
because Nokia has historically been the strong, silent type - releasing
scores of handsets across the entire price and feature spectrum with
little or no fanfare; and in the process, controlling a clear majority
of the global handheld market.
The
N97 seems to have changed all that. At the very least, these opinions
have certainly brought the Nokia fanboys out of the woodwork. A species
not known to be particularly aggressive were now out there, getting
their hands dirty in the kind of blog-wars that are attributed to the
Microsoft-Apple rivalry. It would be nice and simple to dismiss the
entire ruckus as an installment of the strained relationship that Nokia
has had with the US market; more importantly with US carriers and US
'tech gurus'. But the problems Nokia faces with making any significant
impact in the US are certainly not new and nothing in the launch of
this handset suggested that the status quo was about to change in any
significant way. On the other hand, Nokia seems to be trying to develop
better relationships with carriers like AT&T as evidenced by the
launch of the Surge recently. So that leaves us with the device itself.
Is
the N97 an inherently bad device? Probably - other than a bit of time
spent with the device at a Nokia store, I have very little hands-on
experience to form any opinions. But let's for a minute assume that the
N97 is indeed a bad device. The question is, how bad does one device
need to be for it to mark the beginning of the end for an organization
that, as per its latest results, sells more than 103 million mobile
devices a quarter? How bad does it need to be for certain analysts to predict a halving of Nokia's market share from 40% to 20% by the year 2013?
Something
just doesn't feel right. Is the N97 really the first nail in the coffin
for Nokia -- as proclaimed by some analysts? If so, why the N97? Nokia
has launched mobile devices by the truckloads, and not all have been
shining bastions of innovation and craftsmanship. Is it evidently clear
that this is the best that Nokia can achieve and it just doesn't hold
up in the post iPhone, Android, Pre world? Or is it something else?
Let's
take a closer look at some opinions of the device itself. As mentioned
earlier, this is not a review - I'm just going to be looking at some of
the key aspects of the device and the opinions that have been made on
them.
I did not like the review honestly. Only the bad side of the N97 was shown. Practically it is one of the best high-end smartphones available right now. With a 32GB inbuilt memory, 5mp Carl Zeiss lens, Video Recording at 30fps, uploading it on the internet, A-GPS. You can go on and on. It also beats the iPhone 3GS by its performance, memory, specs. I was previously using iPhone 3G. I have got the N97 as soon it was in the market and i'm overwhelmed. It has an awesome physical keypad. The touch keypad would have been better. I hope Nokia solvs this problem by firmware upgrade. I think Nokia N97 beats every phone available in the market.
I am writing this comment on my N97. I think N97 is great. The physical keyboard and the physical dpad help web surfing and writing messages.
Concerning the OS, I think the complaints center on the user interface of the preinstalled applications which do not yet have a fully consistent touch interface. I personally would like consistent interface that I could use solely from the physical keyboard.
This is not a balanced review at all, it is very clearly supporting/augmenting the N97 saying "although this feature is crap, it will suffice most users" ???
Nokia knows this and is relying on these kind of reviews and forgiving mentality to stuff their underpowered offerings down our throats.
Nokia HAS to WAKE UP
Through my occupation I have the privilege of using a wide variety of devices. I am currently using an N97 and absolutely adore it. Sure there are little quirks in the UI that could be bettter but if you really dig into the feature set and utilize them, you will find that the N97 has alot to offer. No it's not as user friendly as an iphone but come on folks, it's not an iphone. This is what some may call a thinking man's smartphone. I give Nokia a high five for it but do look forward to future firmware updates that may make the UI a tad smoother.
Well said. A very balanced report afterall. i am using N97 and I have 5800 too. N97 surely is a hardware marvel. Everytime I open the QWERTY, it reminds me of just that. As a end user, it makes no difference to me with the processor speed. At the end. the user is happy. That's all it matters. Ofcourse, Nokia has to polish the UI. And like in 5800, the next software upgrades will help N97.
I think the biggest difference here if u compare iphone and nokia is the self life of the product how many of us might be still using a nokia phone launched 2-3 years ago,while as iphone are still same and popularly used