• Firefox 3.5: First Look

    Firefox 3.5: First Look

    Rahul Srinivas, Jul 02, 2009 1215 hrs IST

    We take the Firefox 3.5 for a spin. Find out if we are impressed

    Faster, occasionally even faster than Chrome

    private browsing mode could be better

    Expert Rating :
    Rating
    mail share

Expert Review

    next


Mozilla has finally taken the wraps off the latest stable iteration of Firefox - the much awaited version 3.5 - on Tuesday. Firefox 3.5, since its development, faced increasing challenges from its new found competitor Chrome. Chrome which was launched last year, pipped Firefox when it came to sheer speed. While Firefox has always been traditionally IE-centric in its development, aiming to grab the coveted numero uno position in the browser arena, others seem to have caught up from behind. That is what Mozilla is trying to change with its latest release.


 


 


 


It's time we take a first look at the latest version of the world's second most widely used browser. Visually, there is not much of a difference from the earlier versions, unless of course you were on some whacky theme earlier and now are finding it all alien!

Follow Techtree on Twitter

    next

Do you agree with this Review?
YesNo

Up

6

Related Links
First Look at Opera Mini 4.2
Browsing through Time
Google Chrome -- Out of Beta But Still Buggy
Tag keywords
Firefox Firefox 3.5 Mozilla Browser Chrome Opera Internet Explorer Safari Gecko Webkit



Discussion Board
(12) Comments
Grim
,Bangalore, on Jul 25, 2009 12:37 AM
Too good Rahul, you actually came out and justified what you wrote in your review. Not all reviewers can be credited with doing that. Cheerio. P.S - I still prefer Firefox ;)
Report abuse
Aditya
,Mumbai, on Jul 16, 2009 12:06 AM
Your benchmarks should probably have been mentioned along with values for other browsers. Most readers will not know what the numbers imply.
Report abuse
Ayan Debnath
,Kolkata, on Jul 04, 2009 01:28 PM
Dear Author, I personally don't know what kind of PC used in this test, probably a PIII, you should throw it in the water. The scores you have posted is actually SH*T. Probably, asked by M$. Here is my score: SunSpider: 1522.8ms (lower is better and its even lower than Mozilla clams) V8 Benchmark Suite: 236 (higher is better) My config: AMD(939) 4200 with 2GB DDR400 with WinXP-SP2. Firefox with normal setup.
Report abuse
Rahul Srinivas
,Mumbai, on Jul 04, 2009 04:20 PM
It wasnt a P3 of course. I tried it on a Compaq Presario V3149AU running AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-52 processor. Quite an old workhorse you know? Also, the decision to do this on this machine was deliberate. I did have better specced machines in my arsenal, but I chose this one because not everyone has the latest machine around. I do however agree that I should have mentioned my "test bed" there to avoid confusion. Oh and MS dint ask us to anything. We actually don't listen to them (or anyone else for that matter) much. Everyone will have different scores for the tests you have mentioned here, so I aint reading much into it -- except of course for the Acid3 test, on which FF consistently scores 93 - everywhere. Of course Acid3 is system independent.
Report abuse
jason
,Chennai, on Jul 02, 2009 01:45 PM
have you thought about enabling the tracemonkey through the registry. That makes one hell of a difference in speed.
Report abuse
Hemanth Kumar R
,Hyderabad, on Jul 03, 2009 04:03 PM
If your add-ons are not compatible with the new version, install a firefox add-on, 'Nightly Tester Tools'. This will override the compatibility issue you have with the new version and you can enjoy your add-ons as normal.
Report abuse
Shreshtha
,Delhi, on Jul 03, 2009 12:10 PM
Tip - There is a plugin in Firefox which makes it even faster. Really fast. Just give it a try. plugin = fasterfox lite. -Shreshtha
Report abuse
Shreshtha
,Delhi, on Jul 03, 2009 12:07 PM
Firefox 2.0 Great Bug Now again showing in Firefox 3.5. Bug - Browser crashes whenever you signoff from Gmail. Its so annoying.
Report abuse
Jai
,Delhi, on Jul 02, 2009 05:28 PM
Mr. Srinivas is an obvious Chrome fan. He is trying to discover faults in FF which do not exist. Reviewers are expected to be dispassionate. Therefore, the quality of this review is questionable.
Report abuse
Rahul Srinivas
,Mumbai, on Jul 02, 2009 08:15 PM
Jai, IMHO, preferring to use one browser over the other doesn't make one a fan of that browser. If that was the case, everyone is a fan of at least one browser. While it is correct that I personally prefer using Chrome, it doesn't necessarily make me a blind Chrome fan. I however do agree that multiple mentions of Chrome in this piece might have made you believe so. Therefore, I can see where you are coming from. As for discovering "faults" in FF, the only one I could find was the Private browsing mode thing I mentioned in the article. I have been using Firefox on my laptop ever since launch and I am loving it. At office, I prefer using Chrome. Yes, reviewers are meant to be dispassionate, but cant we have a choice of our own? :) Keep writing! Thanks.
Report abuse
dhaval shah
,Ahmedabad, on Jul 02, 2009 04:59 PM
Really its works faster than ever...
Report abuse
Bobby
,Pune, on Jul 02, 2009 02:28 PM
The update doesn't recognise any of the plug-ins or addons evident from the red exclamation marks. One needs to unistall the s/w of the plug-ins and then re-install. I could get Real Networks working onto you tube videos after reinstallation.
Report abuse

Opinion Poll